Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 07:34

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
This Nutrient May Help Lower Your Stroke Risk by 36%, New Study Says - EatingWell
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Your Android phone just got a major feature upgrade for free - including these Pixel models - ZDNET
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
5 symptoms of colon cancer that should not be ignored - Times of India
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Why We Still Can't Find A Solar System Twin - IFLScience
Thank you.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
3 Economic Events That Could Affect Your Portfolio This Week, June 16-20, 2025 - TipRanks
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.